From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 01:17:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21F3516A4CE for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 01:17:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from terminus.inext.hu (terminus.inext.hu [212.108.197.87]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F19A843D2D for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 01:16:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fifteen@inext.hu) Received: from gw.inext.hu (adsl.inext.hu [212.108.198.59]) by terminus.inext.hu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i2N9Gvq5017844 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 10:16:58 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from fifteen@inext.hu) Received: from fif.office.inext.hu (fif.office.inext.hu [192.168.0.2]) by gw.inext.hu (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i2N9GvlJ080998 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 10:16:57 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from fifteen@inext.hu) Received: from fif.office.inext.hu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fif.office.inext.hu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i2N9GvKi057644 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 10:16:57 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from fifteen@fif.office.inext.hu) Received: (from fifteen@localhost) by fif.office.inext.hu (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i2N9GvEB057643 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 10:16:57 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from fifteen) Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 10:16:57 +0100 From: Peter Hollaubek To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040323091657.GA57166@fif.office.inext.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: if_dc + EN5251 + incorrect MAC address X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 09:17:01 -0000 Hi, I had a 4.7-STABLE machine with three same type NICs (Accton Technology Corporation / EN5251-Based Fast Ethernet Adapter). Ifconfig reports the same 08:00:08:00:08:00 MAC address for all three cards. I've searched the mailing lists for similar problems and found some threads on the issue with some PR links that have it fixed. Yesterday I've updated the machine to 4.9-STABLE, but it did not fix anything. There are some patches in the PR-s, but the latest if_dc.c file does not have such lines. Was this problem fixed some other way that just does not work with this card, or was the fix forgotten? One PR ends with 'will be MFC-d for 4.8-RELEASE', the other simply says 'it's been fixed in both CURRENT and STABLE'. Peter