From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Sep 19 01:33:12 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 727D9106566B
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 01:33:12 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from conrads@cox.net)
Received: from eastrmfepo101.cox.net (eastrmfepo101.cox.net [68.230.241.213])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E76C8FC12
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 01:33:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from eastrmimpo109.cox.net ([68.230.241.222])
	by eastrmfepo101.cox.net
	(InterMail vM.8.01.04.00 201-2260-137-20101110) with ESMTP id
	<20110919013311.VEFC12560.eastrmfepo101.cox.net@eastrmimpo109.cox.net>;
	Sun, 18 Sep 2011 21:33:11 -0400
Received: from serene.no-ip.org ([172.18.52.4])
	by eastrmimpo109.cox.net with bizsmtp
	id aRZA1h00J05SVJc02RZAvk; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 21:33:11 -0400
X-CT-Class: Clean
X-CT-Score: 0.00
X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A02020A.4E769BD7.003F,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0
X-CT-Spam: 0
X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=Zx9uHhPf9A+lP7fUsMkPKK1lMswgbRqMQRNZi8vDats=
	c=1 sm=1 a=tw5jEK2Mse0A:10 a=G8Uczd0VNMoA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10
	a=uyavkMrdAAAA:8 a=kviXuzpPAAAA:8 a=csmb0vvu9WRpx-kX-W4A:9
	a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10
	a=JGX6LFFZUg8A:10 a=4vB-4DCPJfMA:10 a=UaX1woSWE4/tG05bAFg+xw==:117
X-CM-Score: 0.00
Authentication-Results: cox.net; none
Received: from cox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by serene.no-ip.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p8J1XAHN065123;
	Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:33:10 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net)
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:33:05 -0500
From: "Conrad J. Sabatier" <conrads@cox.net>
To: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>
Message-ID: <20110918203305.49b9df46@cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAF6rxgkq8upGAKzGe7Cv5dv6eJP9VmhYvShojzqCiwLPvPtKgg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20110918161341.306503ab@cox.net>
	<CAF6rxgkq8upGAKzGe7Cv5dv6eJP9VmhYvShojzqCiwLPvPtKgg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Ports with CPPFLAGS in CONFIGURE_(ARGS|ENV)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 01:33:12 -0000

On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:04:32 -0400
Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> wrote:

> > So, what would be a good approach? =C2=A0Any suggestions?
>=20
> Prepare a patch and get a committer to ask portmgr@ for approval. I
> volunteer if you need someone.

Do you mean one gigantic, monolithic patch that would amend all of them,
or a large set of individual patches (last I checked, there were ~1453
ports in need of this sort of revision)?  I could go either way, just
need to know which would be preferred.

Thanks!

--=20
Conrad J. Sabatier
conrads@cox.net