Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 04:22:21 +0100 From: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> To: obrien@freebsd.org Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/rdesktop pkg-plist Message-ID: <200503110422.25431.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <20050310235755.GB58785@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200503101905.j2AJ5B6R013928@repoman.freebsd.org> <42309B5B.7020201@FreeBSD.org> <20050310235755.GB58785@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart5003473.tliUavSGLa Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday, 11. March 2005 00:57, David O'Brien wrote: > Yes, the patch was a mess, I read what I could from it and updated the > port. The maintainer is not a committer and I did not know the patch > submitted wasn't the maintainer when I read it. The maintainer is not a > committer and thus cannot update this port himself. Looking at the commit history, that port should probably have MAINTAINER re= set=20 to ports@ anyway - that way anyone can make quick & unbuerocratic fixes and= =20 in rdesktop's case there's little danger of the port becoming subject to=20 bitrot anyway. Since I happen to know the current MAINTAINER, I'll ask him = if=20 he's okay with that. =2D-=20 ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org --nextPart5003473.tliUavSGLa Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCMQ7xXhc68WspdLARArhhAKClmAaXtPoEn9YN6F0fy9PJrnjkJACdFKbK 9BbTnciEVn137htUCM48XvY= =NHxq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart5003473.tliUavSGLa--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200503110422.25431.michaelnottebrock>