From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Mar  5 19:10:43 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0038C16A4CE; Sat,  5 Mar 2005 19:10:43 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mp2.macomnet.net (mp2.macomnet.net [195.128.64.6])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E9CE643D48; Sat,  5 Mar 2005 19:10:41 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from maxim@macomnet.ru)
Received-SPF: pass (mp2.macomnet.net: domain of maxim@macomnet.ru designates
	127.0.0.1 as permitted sender) receiver=mp2.macomnet.net; client_ip=127.0.0.1;
	envelope-from=maxim@macomnet.ru;
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mp2.macomnet.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j25JAeZ8028376;
	Sat, 5 Mar 2005 22:10:40 +0300 (MSK)
	(envelope-from maxim@macomnet.ru)
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 22:10:40 +0300 (MSK)
From: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru>
To: Kris Kennaway <kris@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20050305151903.GC26240@hub.freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20050305220919.N70060@mp2.macomnet.net>
References: <87is46kzk1.fsf@neva.vlink.ru>
	<41C26F23F7DF023CB3DF35C5@cc-171.int.t-online.fr>
	<20050305151903.GC26240@hub.freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: Denis Shaposhnikov <dsh@neva.vlink.ru>
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
cc: Mathieu Arnold <mat@mat.cc>
Subject: Re: unionfs 5.4
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 19:10:43 -0000

On Sat, 5 Mar 2005, 15:19-0000, Kris Kennaway wrote:

> On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 04:49:07PM +0300, Denis Shaposhnikov wrote:
> > >>>>> "Mathieu" == Mathieu Arnold <mat@mat.cc> writes:
> >
> >  Mathieu> I'm not answering to your question, but what's the need of a
> >  Mathieu> ro unionfs, a ro nullfs would do the same, no ?
> >
> > It seems that nullfs much slower.
>
> But it works, and doesn't panic the system.  unionfs is
> well-documented to be broken, and this is unlikely to change in the
> near future.

As kern/77251 says this is a recent regression.

-- 
Maxim Konovalov