From owner-freebsd-scsi  Fri Feb 12 11:43:51 1999
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA25135
          for freebsd-scsi-outgoing; Fri, 12 Feb 1999 11:43:51 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from super-g.inch.com (super-g.com [207.240.140.161])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA25130
          for <freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 12 Feb 1999 11:43:48 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from spork@super-g.com)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by super-g.inch.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA23389;
	Fri, 12 Feb 1999 14:43:10 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 1999 14:43:10 -0500 (EST)
From: spork <spork@super-g.com>
X-Sender: spork@super-g.inch.com
To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>
cc: freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: CAM and -stable
In-Reply-To: <xzp4sqwrsz5.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.00.9902121441580.5369-100000@super-g.inch.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

On 16 Dec 1998, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:

> It's not lack of tags that's the problem (64 is pretty good), but the
> fact that the firmware (incorrectly) reports that it's out of queue
> slots when things get busy.

The vendor claims otherwise ;)

Can I ask where you came upon that information?

Thanks,

Charles
 
> DES
> -- 
> Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message
> 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message