From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 19:57:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3109C16A422 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:57:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drew@mykitchentable.net) Received: from relay01.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (relay01.roc.ny.frontiernet.net [66.133.182.164]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6471A43D48 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:57:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drew@mykitchentable.net) Received: from blacklamb.mykitchentable.net (70-97-209-135.dsl2.elk.ca.frontiernet.net [70.97.209.135]) by relay01.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 129ED36436B; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:57:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.30] (unknown [192.168.1.30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by blacklamb.mykitchentable.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0C131648B7; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:57:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <43F2361C.7080400@mykitchentable.net> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:57:16 -0800 From: Drew Tomlinson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steve Douville References: <02ca01c6316c$ce4b2ce0$c5eb020a@sdouvilnonq1> <43F2252D.8060605@mykitchentable.net> <000a01c6319b$56bf5730$6501a8c0@sdouvilnonq1> <43F2323D.4040601@mykitchentable.net> <001701c6319e$ed94bee0$6501a8c0@sdouvilnonq1> In-Reply-To: <001701c6319e$ed94bee0$6501a8c0@sdouvilnonq1> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.3.2 (20050629) at filter02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: IP Routing Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:57:21 -0000 On 2/14/2006 11:43 AM Steve Douville wrote: > By default, it sets the netif to em0 > OK, then what about 'route add -host aaa.bbb.ccc.209 aaa.bbb.ccc.200'? And if that doesn't work, can I please see 'netstat -rn'? You can obfuscate the IPs if you wish. Cheers, Drew > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Drew Tomlinson" > To: "Steve Douville" > Cc: "FreeBSD Questions" > Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 2:40 PM > Subject: Re: IP Routing Question > > > On 2/14/2006 11:17 AM Steve Douville wrote: > >> Weird stuff... >> route add -host aaa.bbb.ccc.209 aaa.bbb.ccc.196 -ifp em1 >> >> > > What happens if you leave off the "-ifp em1"? > > Cheers, > > Drew > > >> doesn't work even if i've already set >> aaa.bbb.ccc.196 link#2 em1 >> >> The only way things work well is if the gateway is set to link#2. The only >> way I can set it to link#2 is if the address was accessed, unsuccessfully, >> creating a record with link#1 as the gateway and then issuing a route >> change >> command to move it to link#2. >> >> it'd be much easier if i could just type >> route add -host aaa.bbb.ccc.xxx link#2 -ifp em1 >> but it doesn't recognize link#2 as a valid address, even though it uses it >> in the table by default!! >> >> Haven't tried the ipfilter yet. Maybe i'll give that a whirl, too. >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Drew Tomlinson" >> To: "Steve Douville" >> Cc: >> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 1:45 PM >> Subject: Re: IP Routing Question >> >> >> >> What happens with a simple 'route add >> aaa.bbb.ccc.196? Or am I misinterpreting what you wish to achieve? >> >> HTH, >> >> Drew >>