From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 27 15:37:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BAE6106566C for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 15:37:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnemmi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f214.google.com (mail-gx0-f214.google.com [209.85.217.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6D638FC1E for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 15:37:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk6 with SMTP id 6so1433041gxk.13 for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 07:37:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=Iw0i5yt2EbjkxXIEwVWMYjzQfYJdUkxUKScurv8QfCw=; b=Jp29j18fXsB4rcXpI0mlwiSurd06Pzm/uLgnLf8v3UxD90X+GRSccVPhLJcqE9wefv WVCOUvtxmPipw2pzF/R55YCPjl64BT9qVldnLQI41eLBDuGftFY6fVAw7DHBZhALSrqT EVMKxmpNXe1uhwa1xy9B6tnV3j8DarfHQVKyw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :message-id; b=r2cq3VBK5hMDVSQcuDfGqIoYTe8UCMvtYR7KK3tihY1s3r3JnBVE9s64pT7fk/N6bm l11GwdlmIEE6PGefB7IV7mxRiAkpy7FHTkoNuptRuXjWwllgofBgH7KSqyBnkgeyd4mH tv5GfRuOI0wds3jW2KpSeSKG9iQdhScTKtd5k= Received: by 10.150.171.4 with SMTP id t4mr1838801ybe.346.1259336251204; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 07:37:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.101? ([190.177.194.36]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 14sm709349gxk.14.2009.11.27.07.37.29 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 27 Nov 2009 07:37:30 -0800 (PST) From: Gonzalo Nemmi To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 13:37:27 -0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <4B0FBBF2.4040109@gmx.net> <200911271331.28581.pieter@degoeje.nl> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200911271337.27462.gnemmi@gmail.com> Subject: Re: NO_PROFILE versus WITHOUT_PROFILING X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 15:37:32 -0000 On Friday 27 November 2009 12:44:55 pm Michael Powell wrote: > Pieter de Goeje wrote: > > On Friday 27 November 2009 12:45:54 Frank Staals wrote: > >> When I was setting up my system for a complete rebuild I came > >> across something unclear to me; I always used NO_PROFILE in my > >> make.conf, however from what I've read specific make options to > >> build the kernel/base system should be in /etc/src.config. The > >> manpage of src.conf specifies the option WITHOUT_PROFILING, which > >> seemed to be the flag that I was looking for. Just to be certain I > >> always keep the 'Rebuilding World' chapter of the handbook close, > >> however that still specifies to use NO_PROFILE in make.conf. > >> > >> So now my question: What is the desired way of turning of > >> profiling: NO_PROFILE in make.conf or WITHOUT_PROFILING in > >> src.conf ? > >> > >> Thanks in advance > > > > WITHOUT_PROFILING in src.conf. The NO_xxx options are obsolete and > > should not be used. > > Yes - src.conf is used for the system. make.conf will contain options > you want to apply to building ports. They were split to separate > them. > > -Mike Yes, src.conf is used for the system and that's where WITHOUT_PROFILING should go, yet still, you might should take a look in here first: http://phk.freebsd.dk/misc/stable7_build_options/ and see what might happen if you use it. read this thread (the whole thing) before going any further ..: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2009-November/013561.html Best Regards Gonzalo Nemmi