From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Sep 8 17:01:06 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA12231 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Tue, 8 Sep 1998 17:01:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from shell.futuresouth.com (shell.futuresouth.com [198.78.58.28]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA12224 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 1998 17:01:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fullermd@futuresouth.com) Received: (from fullermd@localhost) by shell.futuresouth.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA24784; Tue, 8 Sep 1998 19:00:42 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <19980908190041.03400@futuresouth.com> Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1998 19:00:41 -0500 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" To: austin wood Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ed0 References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88 In-Reply-To: ; from austin wood on Tue, Sep 08, 1998 at 07:09:49PM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Sep 08, 1998 at 07:09:49PM -0400, austin wood woke me up to tell me: > > I'm not sure if I'm doing any of this correctly, as I'm not familiar on > how to do this. However, I do not understand why natd cannot find > interface ed0 because ep0 is probed succesfully on bootup. In the LINT > file I happen to see the ep0 is buggy. I hope this is not the problem. Read what you just wrote ;) "Natd cann't find *ed0* because *ep0* is probed sucessfully..." Or do you actually have another card in the system that's ed0? *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* | FreeBSD; the way computers were meant to be | * "The only reason I'm burning my candle at both ends, is * | that I haven't figured out how to light the middle yet."| * fullermd@futuresouth.com :-} MAtthew Fuller * | http://keystone.westminster.edu/~fullermd | *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message