Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 19:19:06 -0400 From: "illoai@gmail.com" <illoai@gmail.com> To: Peter Vereshagin <peter@vereshagin.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: `ls -l` shows size of file other than of the folder? Message-ID: <CAHHBGkoG=-PAZ4s3Qg7t4bgEWcwCLJzWajGv_o-YaEzQYeeNvA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20120613202325.GC5800@external.screwed.box> References: <20120613202325.GC5800@external.screwed.box>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 13 June 2012 16:23, Peter Vereshagin <peter@vereshagin.org> wrote: > Hello. > > I have the directory in the file system with 2 regular files each =A0of = =A0which =A0is > sized as 700M according to 'ls -l'. =A0But the torrent client and 'du -s'= and =A0'ls > -l's 'total' show that the directory size is 300M. > > How can that be? =A0Are there different file sizes =A0stored =A0on =A0a = =A0ufs1 =A0in =A0their > metadata? > > ot the least how could I see the 'real' size of each of those files, both= =A0~150M > actulally, with a system command? > The -s flag to ls(1) will show you the actual number of blocks in use (I believe it honours BLOCKSIZE, though you might want to check). --=20 --
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAHHBGkoG=-PAZ4s3Qg7t4bgEWcwCLJzWajGv_o-YaEzQYeeNvA>