From owner-freebsd-current Tue Apr 15 01:48:45 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id BAA26432 for current-outgoing; Tue, 15 Apr 1997 01:48:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from innocence.interface-business.de (innocence.interface-business.de [193.101.57.202]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA26420 for ; Tue, 15 Apr 1997 01:48:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ida.interface-business.de (ida.interface-business.de [193.101.57.203]) by innocence.interface-business.de (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id KAA23558 for ; Tue, 15 Apr 1997 10:48:36 +0200 Received: (from j@localhost) by ida.interface-business.de (8.8.5/8.7.3) with UUCP id KAA01887 for current@freebsd.org; Tue, 15 Apr 1997 10:49:13 +0200 (MEST) X-Authentication-Warning: ida.interface-business.de: j set sender to j@uriah.heep.sax.de using -f Received: (from j@localhost) by uriah.heep.sax.de (8.8.5/8.8.5) id UAA00500; Mon, 14 Apr 1997 20:48:52 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <19970414204851.XX16922@uriah.heep.sax.de> Date: Mon, 14 Apr 1997 20:48:51 +0200 From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) To: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ISODEVMAP in cd9660 ? References: <421.860999989@critter> X-Mailer: Mutt 0.60_p2-3,5,8-9 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669 X-PGP-Fingerprint: DC 47 E6 E4 FF A6 E9 8F 93 21 E0 7D F9 12 D6 4E Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) In-Reply-To: <421.860999989@critter>; from phk@dk.tfs.com on Apr 14, 1997 08:39:49 +0200 Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk As phk@dk.tfs.com wrote: > Anybody know a good reason for not nuking the "ISODEVMAP" stuff in cd9660 ? Does anybody realize what's the intention behind all this? -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)