From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Feb 12 16:25:49 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7512337B491 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 16:25:46 -0800 (PST) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id BAA91928; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 01:25:42 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Jordan Hubbard Cc: Greg Lehey , Danny Braniss , Matt Dillon , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: soft updates performance References: <79723.982023757@winston.osd.bsdi.com> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 13 Feb 2001 01:25:41 +0100 In-Reply-To: Jordan Hubbard's message of "Mon, 12 Feb 2001 16:22:37 -0800" Message-ID: Lines: 9 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Jordan Hubbard writes: > [...] That implies to me, at least, that after a certain > point the CPU is going to be the bottleneck. More likely RAM bandwidth. Those 133 Mhz FSBs ought to help, though. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message