From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 19 10:57:49 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from amanda.qmpgmc.ac.uk (amanda.qmpgmc.ac.uk [194.81.5.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3D9514D2B for ; Wed, 19 May 1999 10:57:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from greg@qmpgmc.ac.uk) Received: from greg (gquinlan [194.81.0.56]) by amanda.qmpgmc.ac.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id SAA12294; Wed, 19 May 1999 18:57:44 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <012201bea221$0faeffa0$380051c2@greg.qmpgmc.ac.uk> Reply-To: "Greg Quinlan" From: "Greg Quinlan" To: "Geff Hanoian" Cc: Subject: Re: Memory leaks & kernel panic/reboot & ahc reboot Date: Wed, 19 May 1999 18:57:28 +0100 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG So Geff... Maybe you can educate me then.... After processes have taken all available memory (malloc) down to the threshold... What type of memory would be used next? Greg -----Original Message----- From: Geff Hanoian To: greg@qmpgmc.ac.uk Cc: mike@smith.net.au ; freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Date: 19 May 1999 18:47 Subject: Re: Memory leaks & kernel panic/reboot & ahc reboot >Greg Spews: > >> Previously Mike Smith wrote: >> >The Active/Inactive/Wired/Cache/Buf/Free statistics refer to the >> >disposition of physical memory. They are unrelated to swap usage..... >> >> Physical memory unrelated to swap.... that's a new one! >> Do you get many laughs? >> > >Greg, > > Do you? Many of us are continuing to laugh. Not due to your lack >of knowledge, but the fact that you are unaware of the lack. > >Geff > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message