From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 4 13:36:25 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B684116A4CE; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 13:36:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (209-128-86-226.bayarea.net [209.128.86.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F088F43FE0; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 13:36:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Received: from dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net [192.168.4.201]) by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hB4LZwA1021238; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 13:35:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@piii.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: from dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) hB4LZw2j052722; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 13:35:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: (from marcel@localhost) by dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id hB4LZwsq052721; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 13:35:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 13:35:58 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar To: John-Mark Gurney Message-ID: <20031204213558.GB52636@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> References: <20031204.111430.78763615.imp@bsdimp.com> <20031204210904.GI54398@funkthat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031204210904.GI54398@funkthat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: "M. Warner Losh" cc: John Baldwin Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/i386 machdep.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 21:36:26 -0000 On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 01:09:04PM -0800, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > > One way would be to make acpi a newbus (which is what I believe Warner > is thinking of) attachment... Then madt would become a device off the > acpi bus... I think it's time people read the ACPI specification and try to understand how things are supposed to work, including on non-i386 platforms. I don't think I've heard of anything more silly than having a table (disguised as a device) attach to a bus (which is what ACPI disguises as). -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net