From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 2 04:19:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EC081065670; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 04:19:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fjwcash@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qc0-f182.google.com (mail-qc0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDA748FC08; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 04:19:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qcsg15 with SMTP id g15so1783733qcs.13 for ; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 21:19:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=yc/OukTmTJpyn+PQI6o6v2qL/kiXfS0wpP7s9u2G9qU=; b=C/WNfHZJgZvp1rUgLns6AXqZm74OcyRB0JBpImmKwiZf12nan+F3SvoDKoxcoNADHK CjObx2msIjIZV4+44pf/DCrkRoDxsSO/Iqxe5ffxYYgitEUs9wU0tGTs0uizKa8ZCZ5h HTZGbp4ZOgSSdUq68YTIHcOeGR71Asqw4u8fsfHgHl9A6FtdzwPDrRJxl1MrwTE7ruHB nd9rld9vR6NQXysx44IV5FFo9nC/UnF7yRSX+MdhrzGiL4jl2aDIHWXDyyPj36eBj5OL PYBlhZ5nCSnV/ujBAFtU/gPyYIcSrIr4aRmP/3/BF1zQf/Smci3jFLKPKwq3g9+M01vP uvsg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.135.16 with SMTP id l16mr1567269qct.135.1338610755633; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 21:19:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.20.148 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 21:19:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.20.148 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 21:19:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120602032529.GE1377@glenbarber.us> References: <20120601121555.GF5335@home.opsec.eu> <4FC8B67D.5090208@digsys.bg> <20120601131236.GJ8591@macbook.bluepipe.net> <20120602010346.GA27660@isuckatdomains.members.linode.com> <4D744565-4073-485E-B769-82BE1F7E2C0A@ee.ryerson.ca> <20120602032529.GE1377@glenbarber.us> Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 21:19:15 -0700 Message-ID: From: Freddie Cash To: Glen Barber Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: David Magda , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2012 04:19:18 -0000 On Jun 1, 2012 8:27 PM, "Glen Barber" wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 11:14:10PM -0400, David Magda wrote: > > ZFS is for storing file systems on locally connected block devices. > > Gluster is a network file system where data can be distributed over > > many nodes. > > > > Pardon my ignorance to not knowing what gluster is, but is this > conceptually similar to HAST? Similar in concept, but different layers in the storage stack. HAST sits between the physical disks and the filesystem, replicating data between two systems. So, disks -- HAST -- ZFS. Glustre sits above the storage system, replicating data between systems. So, disks -- ZFS (via Zvols) -- Glustre. The primary difference is that HAST provides only a single master node that all I/O goes through. The filesystem(s) above HAST cannot be mounted on more than one host. I/O is limited to what the master can handle. Glustre is distributed across hosts, so I/O is multiplied (to some extent), and data is accessible across multiple hosts.