Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 23:48:39 -0700 From: Jason Evans <jasone@canonware.com> To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> Cc: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com>, freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SMP discussion moving to freebsd-smp Message-ID: <20000620234839.C233@blitz.canonware.com> In-Reply-To: <200006201754.KAA87277@apollo.backplane.com>; from dillon@apollo.backplane.com on Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 10:54:34AM -0700 References: <Pine.BSF.4.05.10006201015170.12031-100000@semuta.feral.com> <200006201754.KAA87277@apollo.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 10:54:34AM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote: > Yes, all i386. At the meeting we decided to break the alpha port > temporarily. I have no recollection of this even being discussed, let alone decided on. > I think alpha work can begin when I make the SP (single processor) > patches available. I would recommend sticking to SP alpha builds > probably for a few months until our i386 MP work (which is mostly > machine independant) is reasonably stable. (does alpha even have an MP > build yet?). I for one have an alpha that I really want this SMP work to run on in a timely fashion. Granted, alpha may reasonably lag behind i386 by some amount (on the order of days), but FreeBSD is no longer just i386, and we need to give the alpha port enough attention to keep it more or less in sync with the i386 port. Matt, we've threatened to provide you with an alpha, and we may force one on you if the need arises. =) Seriously though, alpha is not going to be intentionally left in the dust on this project. Jason To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000620234839.C233>