From owner-freebsd-net Thu Jan 28 18:32:18 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA01744 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Thu, 28 Jan 1999 18:32:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from hawaii.conterra.com (hawaii.conterra.com [209.12.164.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA01737 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 1999 18:32:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from myself@conterra.com) Received: from dmaddox.conterra.com (dmaddox.conterra.com [209.12.169.48]) by hawaii.conterra.com (8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA11483 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 1999 21:32:13 -0500 (EST) Received: (from myself@localhost) by dmaddox.conterra.com (8.9.2/8.9.1) id VAA02492 for net@FreeBSD.ORG; Thu, 28 Jan 1999 21:32:12 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from myself) Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 21:32:12 -0500 From: "Donald J . Maddox" To: net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Why does tcpdump not see tun0 when loaded as a kld? Message-ID: <19990128213212.A2442@dmaddox.conterra.com> Reply-To: dmaddox@conterra.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I recently decided to try building a kernel without static tun0, and use the kld module instead. Unfortunately, I am seeing this: # ifconfig -a lp0: flags=8810 mtu 1500 ds0: flags=8201 mtu 65532 inet 10.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 tun0: flags=8051 mtu 1500 inet 209.12.169.48 --> 209.12.169.2 netmask 0xffffff00 tun1: flags=8010 mtu 1500 lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 # tcpdump -i tun0 tcpdump: tun0: Device not configured Does tun0 _have_ to be compiled in statically for tcpdump to see it? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message