From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 18 21:24:40 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7102816A400 for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2007 21:24:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jroberson@chesapeake.net) Received: from webaccess-cl.virtdom.com (webaccess-cl.virtdom.com [216.240.101.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D72213C4A8 for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2007 21:24:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jroberson@chesapeake.net) Received: from [192.168.1.101] (c-71-231-138-78.hsd1.or.comcast.net [71.231.138.78]) (authenticated bits=0) by webaccess-cl.virtdom.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l6ILOcq2068148 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 18 Jul 2007 17:24:39 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jroberson@chesapeake.net) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 14:27:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Jeff Roberson X-X-Sender: jroberson@10.0.0.1 To: Rene Ladan In-Reply-To: <469E83F8.3090103@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20070718142649.Y561@10.0.0.1> References: <20070716233030.D92541@10.0.0.1> <469E83F8.3090103@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ULE/SCHED_SMP diff for 7.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 21:24:40 -0000 On Wed, 18 Jul 2007, Rene Ladan wrote: > Jeff Roberson schreef: >> http://people.freebsd.org/~jeff/ule.diff >> >> This patch is scheduled for inclusion in 7.0. I would like anyone who >> cares to run it to validate that it does not create any stability or >> performance regression over the existing ULE. This patch replaces ULE >> with SCHED_SMP, which will now no longer exist as a seperate fork of ULE. > [..] > > I cvsupped this evening at 19:34 UTC. The new ULE scheduler works fine > in single-user mode (it survives "make kernel"), but when I go to > multi-user mode I get a "sched_add: trying to run inhibited thread" > panic (2 vmcores lost due to fsck :( ) Can you get me a backtrace? You can enable KDB and DDB in your kernel along with INVARIANTS. Just type 'tr' and record the function names Thanks, Jeff > > This is on a SMP dualcore Intel T5600 laptop (dmesg + kernelconfig attached) > > Could it be caused by some user process (pgsql / boinc) ? > > Well, at least the 4BSD continues to run... > > Regards, > Rene > -- > GPG fingerprint = E738 5471 D185 7013 0EE0 4FC8 3C1D 6F83 12E1 84F6 > (subkeys.pgp.net) > > "It won't fit on the line." > -- me, 2001 > >