From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jan 22 20:58:04 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B569D16A4CE
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 20:58:04 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from web26804.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (web26804.mail.ukl.yahoo.com
	[217.146.176.80])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F3F3943D2D
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 20:58:03 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from cguttesen@yahoo.dk)
Received: (qmail 76357 invoked by uid 60001); 22 Jan 2005 20:58:03 -0000
Message-ID: <20050122205803.76355.qmail@web26804.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
Received: from [194.248.174.50] by web26804.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP;
	Sat, 22 Jan 2005 21:58:03 CET
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 21:58:03 +0100 (CET)
From: Claus Guttesen <cguttesen@yahoo.dk>
To: Stefan Cars <stefan@snowfall.se>
In-Reply-To: <41F2BC4B.3060901@snowfall.se>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Boot / Install freeze with Dell PE1850 5.3 and amd64
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 20:58:04 -0000

> Thanks very much, is RELENG_5 very stable then ? Is
> it recommended do 
> use on RELENG_5 on a production system, not
> RELENG_5_3 ?

I'm running RELENG_5 (stable) on some webservers, one
nfs-server and one db-server (postgresql). Works very
nice. According to the current-list RELENG_5 has some
enhancements to smp (amongst others) which aren't
found in 5_3 and makes it better suited as a server.

Claus