From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 3 22:13:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1CB216A402 for ; Wed, 3 May 2006 22:13:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from hood.oook.cz (hood.oook.cz [195.250.137.134]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD64B43D48 for ; Wed, 3 May 2006 22:13:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from ikaros.oook.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hood.oook.cz (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k43MDAuV047039 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 4 May 2006 00:13:10 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from pav@localhost) by ikaros.oook.cz (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k43MD93Z047028; Thu, 4 May 2006 00:13:09 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: ikaros.oook.cz: pav set sender to pav@FreeBSD.org using -f From: Pav Lucistnik To: Kevin Oberman In-Reply-To: <20060503180559.863EC45042@ptavv.es.net> References: <20060503180559.863EC45042@ptavv.es.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-QL8phneAJyTO18Ya6iUc" Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 00:13:09 +0200 Message-Id: <1146694389.7471.12.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Cc: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: acpi_thermal on nforce 4 board X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pav@FreeBSD.org List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 22:13:26 -0000 --=-QL8phneAJyTO18Ya6iUc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Kevin Oberman p=ED=B9e v st 03. 05. 2006 v 11:05 -0700: > Now, why does my mbmon work out of the box and you need a small patch? I guess because they used some fancy new variation of the chip. And now we're really off topic :) --=20 Pav Lucistnik XML is a giant step in no direction at all. -- Erik Naggum --=-QL8phneAJyTO18Ya6iUc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Toto je =?iso-8859-2?Q?digit=E1ln=EC?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?iso-8859-2?Q?_=E8=E1st?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?= -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBEWSr1ntdYP8FOsoIRArM/AKCvOETkN183+ArALnsiS8ysOP8MvwCgm0H7 qsPTajcS9hkhZOCiQl8RLJQ= =HRUN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-QL8phneAJyTO18Ya6iUc--