From owner-freebsd-chat  Mon Nov 10 01:26:41 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id BAA16569
          for chat-outgoing; Mon, 10 Nov 1997 01:26:41 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA16564
          for <chat@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 10 Nov 1997 01:26:39 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.v-site.net [127.0.0.1])
	by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA14008;
	Mon, 10 Nov 1997 01:26:24 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199711100926.BAA14008@rah.star-gate.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97
To: Ruslan Shevchenko <Ruslan@Shevchenko.kiev.ua>
cc: chat@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Could FreeBSD be a viable platform for large SQL/SAP/etc 
 enterprise applications?
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 10 Nov 1997 12:06:29 GMT."
             <3466F8C4.1A3F3A1A@Shevchenko.kiev.ua> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 1997 01:26:24 -0800
From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Nope, just back up your statement . I am not saying that FreeBSD is
the best OS in the world. BTW: this is not a psychology test. I refuse
to fall into the argument of justifying my inquisition on your
unqualified and unquantified assertions. If you wish to open
a thesis statement then at least you have to further elaborate
on the ways that FreeBSD can be improved .

"For clients -- if you love Unix -- then Linux "

warrants an explanation or justification because  is
too vague  for an intelligent discussion in this forum .


	Amancio



	
> Amancio Hasty wrote:
> 
> > ? Amancio Hasty wrote:
> > ?
> > ? ? ? ?   for clients -- if you love Unix -- then Linux.
> > ? ? ?
> > ? ? ? I'd say you must be joking, but based on the accuracy of the rest of
> > ? ? ? your response, this is perfectly in character.
> > ? ? ?
> > ? ?
> > ? ? His posting was just flame bait .
> > ? ?
> > ?
> > ?   No, it is not flame.    It is real problem.
> > ?
> > ?
> >
> > Care to elaborate?
> >
> 
>   I can't uderstood you.   The question was: is the FreeBSD commerce-usable
> system.
>    I explore my opinion, without flames.
>    Then I receive un-argumentable flame.
> 
>    About Linux --- it have the same problems, expect jdk support a little
>   better.  ( I,  prefer FreeBSD ;) )
> 
>   My answer was not aggressive.
> But I received reaction in style :
>   "Only, that you must say, is  that the FreeBSD is  the best OS in the
> world, all other senetences are flame"
> 
>   I think that such point of view it is not right.
> 
> So, let's be more tolerant.
> 
> 
> >         Amancio
> 
> 
>