Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 11:58:42 +0000 From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> To: Marcus Alves Grando <mnag@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/88332: Update port: devel/flyspray -> 0.9.8 Message-ID: <436DEFF2.5000507@foobar.org> In-Reply-To: <200511060055.jA60tnMb053609@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200511060055.jA60tnMb053609@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Marcus Alves Grando wrote: > Feedback received. But remove PORT_EPOCH before commit. Ok, but this is really version 0.9.8.1 that I've submitted, not 0.9.8 - the patch files bring it up to 0.9.8.1. Is there any way of reflecting this in the port naming scheme without changing the version to 0.9.8.1, as this affects the download filename? The Flyspray people are not releasing a 0.9.8.1 tarball? Nick
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?436DEFF2.5000507>