From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 11:59:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3672D16A41F; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 11:59:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nick@foobar.org) Received: from mail.acquirer.com (mail.acquirer.com [213.94.200.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AF0643D5E; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 11:58:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nick@foobar.org) X-Envelope-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from [192.168.1.61] ([192.168.1.61]) by mail.acquirer.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jA6BwmRg044657 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 6 Nov 2005 11:58:50 GMT (envelope-from nick@foobar.org) Message-ID: <436DEFF2.5000507@foobar.org> Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 11:58:42 +0000 From: Nick Hilliard User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marcus Alves Grando References: <200511060055.jA60tnMb053609@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200511060055.jA60tnMb053609@freefall.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on muffin.acquirer.com X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV devel-20050516/1165/Sun Nov 6 05:12:58 2005 on muffin.acquirer.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/88332: Update port: devel/flyspray -> 0.9.8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 11:59:00 -0000 Marcus Alves Grando wrote: > Feedback received. But remove PORT_EPOCH before commit. Ok, but this is really version 0.9.8.1 that I've submitted, not 0.9.8 - the patch files bring it up to 0.9.8.1. Is there any way of reflecting this in the port naming scheme without changing the version to 0.9.8.1, as this affects the download filename? The Flyspray people are not releasing a 0.9.8.1 tarball? Nick