From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 5 00:33:25 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A4091065679 for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2008 00:33:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+WT=005d935f@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from turtle-out.mxes.net (turtle-out.mxes.net [216.86.168.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 598988FC25 for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2008 00:33:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+WT=005d935f@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by turtle-in.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EAD51647B5 for ; Wed, 4 Jun 2008 20:16:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9034D23E3F4 for ; Wed, 4 Jun 2008 20:16:35 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 01:16:32 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080605011632.1172a03b@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <484713B6.2030503@magichamster.com> References: <484713B6.2030503@magichamster.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.4.0 (GTK+ 2.12.9; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Effects of CPUTYPE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2008 00:33:25 -0000 On Wed, 04 Jun 2008 23:14:14 +0100 Mark Ovens wrote: > For months now I've been having ever increasing problems with > software (ports) stopping working - or not working properly; xorg, > digikam, jalbum, etc. >=20 > ... > I understand that this optimizes compilation for that CPU but can > this potentially cause problems? Is this a possible cause of strange=20 > problems? All my ports are built from source rather than from > packages so are built with this option. I think it's unlikely, but it's easy enough to eliminate. =20 =46rom the ports you mention, xorg does seem to be holding a smoking gun. If you have any unnecessary features enabled in xorg.conf, I'd turn them off.