From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 9 09:48:46 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AB13106564A for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2009 09:48:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from M.S.Powell@salford.ac.uk) Received: from relay0.salford.ac.uk (relay0.salford.ac.uk [146.87.0.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EE80B8FC1A for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2009 09:48:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from M.S.Powell@salford.ac.uk) Received: (qmail 2660 invoked by uid 98); 9 Apr 2009 09:48:44 -0000 Received: from 146.87.255.121 by relay0.salford.ac.uk (envelope-from , uid 401) with qmail-scanner-2.01 (clamdscan: 0.94.2/9216. spamassassin: 3.2.4. Clear:RC:1(146.87.255.121):. Processed in 0.035714 secs); 09 Apr 2009 09:48:44 -0000 Received: from rust.salford.ac.uk (HELO rust.salford.ac.uk) (146.87.255.121) by relay0.salford.ac.uk (qpsmtpd/0.3x.614) with SMTP; Thu, 09 Apr 2009 10:48:44 +0100 Received: (qmail 12939 invoked by uid 1002); 9 Apr 2009 09:48:42 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 9 Apr 2009 09:48:42 -0000 Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 10:48:42 +0100 (BST) From: "Mark Powell" To: Ivan Voras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090409104451.D38445@rust.salford.ac.uk> References: <20090408170231.K38445@rust.salford.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kbdmux vs ATA? (was: ATA related panic during ZFS scrub) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 09:48:47 -0000 On Wed, 8 Apr 2009, Ivan Voras wrote: > Hmmm, this shows a lock order problem between ATA and kbdmux's Giant. Ooops. It seems I flunked my 'reading panics' class :( >> / is ufs on USB key > > Are you saying the system has only USB drives or that the ZFS pool was > on the USB drive (or something else)? > > In any case, USB drives do not appear as ATA drives. Sorry. I wasn't clear. I mentioned the usb key, as I've seen other threads reporting zfs corruption with usb. / ufs on usb key Everything else except / is on SATA: /pool raidz1 4x500gb+500gb stripe of 2xSATA drives /pool2 raidz2 6x1tb Cheers. -- Mark Powell - UNIX System Administrator - The University of Salford Information & Learning Services, Clifford Whitworth Building, Salford University, Manchester, M5 4WT, UK. Tel: +44 161 295 6843 Fax: +44 161 295 5888 www.pgp.com for PGP key