From owner-freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 17 08:15:27 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C910D16A404 for ; Thu, 17 May 2007 08:15:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hselasky@freebsd.org) Received: from swip.net (mailfe13.swip.net [212.247.155.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66CE813C468 for ; Thu, 17 May 2007 08:15:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hselasky@freebsd.org) X-Cloudmark-Score: 0.000000 [] Received: from [82.116.76.134] (account mc467741@c2i.net HELO [192.168.1.106]) by mailfe13.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.7) with ESMTPA id 99068321; Thu, 17 May 2007 10:15:25 +0200 From: Hans Petter Selasky To: "Mikhail T." Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 10:15:13 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <464B3E10.5080802@aldan.algebra.com> <200705162126.00656.hselasky@freebsd.org> <464B5BC6.9020908@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <464B5BC6.9020908@aldan.algebra.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200705171015.13289.hselasky@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Subject: Re: All-in-one printer/scanner dilemma X-BeenThere: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD support for USB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 08:15:27 -0000 Hi, On Wednesday 16 May 2007 21:30, Mikhail T. wrote: > Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > >> You mean, sane may be able to access the scanner part, even if ulpt is > >> attached? > > > > Yes, but that may [or can be] change[d]. > > I'm confused, are you saying, it may be possible to share the > functionality /now/? So, which device should I give to sane? The > /dev/ulpt0? No, you need to change "uscanner.c" so that it does not grab the complete device, but rather just one interface. Also you need some information which interface is the scanner and which is the printer. > > > We're talking some time this year. > > Great -- the sooner the better, thank you! (Frankly, it is embarrassing, > that we did not have it 3 years ago :-( Not to point any fingers at > anyone in particular.) --HPS