From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Apr 25 01:19:40 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 417F6FB998E for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 01:19:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (ns.dreamchaser.org [66.109.141.57]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "dreamchaser.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 777457447A for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 01:19:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway [192.168.151.122]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w3P1JU7J063795 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2018 19:19:30 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) From: Gary Aitken Subject: recommended setup for building ports in development env? Reply-To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org, freebsd@dreamchaser.org To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 19:18:50 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [192.168.151.101]); Tue, 24 Apr 2018 19:19:31 -0600 (MDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 01:19:40 -0000 Asked this on questions a while ago and got no response; any thoughts would be much appreciated. I'm trying to set up a development environment for a few ports. I established a parallel ports tree and set the environment variables PREFIX=${MYFREEBSD}/usr/local WORKDIR=${MYFREEBSD}/var/db/portsnap PORTSDIR=${MYFREEBSD}/usr/ports With those set, I can build and install some things. For example, I can build and install graphics/ufraw, and with my PATH properly extended to include ${MYFREEBSD}/usr/local/bin I can execute it. I can also build and install x11/babl into ${MYFREEBSD}. Running a normally built gimp finds the new libbabl located in a different, non-standard place: $ ldd `which gimp` | grep babl libbabl-0.1.so.0 => /usr/home/.../usr/local/lib/libbabl-0.1.so.0 I didn't expect that to work; nice. However, when I go to build graphics/gegl it fails because it can't find the installed babl: ===> gegl-0.3.34 depends on shared library: libbabl-0.1.so - not found If I set LOCALBASE=${MYFREEBSD}/usr/local it wants to rebuild all dependencies, since it doesn't find any of the normally installed stuff. Adding -L${MYFREEBSD}/usr/local/lib to LDFLAGS -I${MYFREEBSD}/usr/local/include to CPPFLAGS in the Makefile doesn't solve the problem. Is there a good solution to this, or do I have to set LOCALBASE with the resulting build of everything else, not just the things that I need to upgrade for this work? Hopefully there's a way to extend the normal search path for port builds? Thanks for any hints, Gary