From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Jul 7 15:23:45 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF8DF995C37 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 15:23:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marquis@roble.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD8D31500 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 15:23:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marquis@roble.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id D9A70995C36; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 15:23:45 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9307995C35 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 15:23:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marquis@roble.com) Received: from mx5.roble.com (mx5.roble.com [206.40.34.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx5.roble.com", Issuer "mx5.roble.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD63714FF for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 15:23:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marquis@roble.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 08:23:38 -0700 (PDT) From: Roger Marquis To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: mail/postfix default build options request: SASL In-Reply-To: <559B6791.7050407@FreeBSD.org> References: <559B643F.3060409@calorieking.com> <559B6791.7050407@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2015 15:23:46 -0000 > On 7/07/2015 3:31 PM, Gregory Orange wrote: >> I don't know if this is a helpful forum to raise it, but I would like to >> request that SASL be enabled in the default build options for >> mail/postfix. We don't use the upstream Postfix package but have noticed that sites serving IMAP use Dovecot more often than other impads by a large margin. > +1 on security related options enabled by default > +1 on OPTIONS_DEFAULT matching upstream defaults > -1 on OPTIONS_DEFAULT introducing large dependency sets Agreed and should note that mail/postfix' unnecessary build-time dependency on perl can be just as problematic. Most of the time we simply delete any references to perl from the Makefile, otherwise it's a real pain to wait through a perl build as many/most systems don't have it installed. Roger