From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Thu Mar 29 13:45:11 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9056BF77777 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 13:45:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from byond.lenox@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf0-f51.google.com (mail-lf0-f51.google.com [209.85.215.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39D406EC01 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 13:45:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from byond.lenox@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf0-f51.google.com with SMTP id q5-v6so8476599lff.12 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 06:45:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=hBp4nxkP2KBsQw6JLlyzxIVSmY3BbWjZ1Je+QloS5xQ=; b=kmd0QZ63fiwFI6fohqzMBOCvcn/sI/348zn3Aewb6ogp/nTXiMeH4wOBLPBF0OtS2G KRpjJEFndoKPQFR6CODgzbmkh0dRtjO4K6dYe28ElxsNtq59XfYvDgRVjHTl4M2U4IEP nIyYZS+xpQXMP1zkOXNx6ctBT+CNdvZGLD1hWhN+PNUZ9dWddG6J9s23trffhN2tPcnG vSNzCyz5S/nN9DByAJr5RtH/6hAOYKwTb1jlXFYYWFhIyki4zGjX2bqx5TX6n3r2gf7Y oWth2qRibZV4kr92aGJ4ADjgtjqCllVQkkv1eTPHNzoQA8picS7k6usVsiN0nGR4azGA +Tyg== X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7GSRgkeNmS9kcF+LZs6QdFbgfYCK72ursI/UOMzd0FCCOj6IWnX KZnjUGU/by4iFgsgHd3navFyEkgK X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4/uEH/lGF1/IRhoocOD0sk6XHcHGfKFsuavAmfbRXWwQSSyeDm1eSHKqP2R/RQgWTsCUnkIQQ== X-Received: by 2002:a19:a705:: with SMTP id q5-v6mr5225533lfe.2.1522331103314; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 06:45:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lf0-f48.google.com (mail-lf0-f48.google.com. [209.85.215.48]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i18-v6sm1153732lfj.50.2018.03.29.06.45.03 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 29 Mar 2018 06:45:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf0-f48.google.com with SMTP id u3-v6so8488392lff.5 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 06:45:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.46.114.26 with SMTP id n26mr5641362ljc.74.1522331102923; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 06:45:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.46.129.90 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 06:44:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20180329133853.GH805@lena.kiev> References: <20180329133853.GH805@lena.kiev> From: Kyle Evans Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 08:44:42 -0500 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: KBI unexpexted change in stable/11 ? To: Lena@lena.kiev.ua Cc: FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 13:45:11 -0000 On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 8:38 AM, wrote: >> From: Kevin Oberman > >> Regardless of intent, updates to port based modules can and and will break >> when the kernel is updated. > > Are packages for pkg.freebsd.org built on -STABLE or latest -RELEASE? > > After 11.2 is released, if package for nvidia-driver > is installed or upgraded on a machine with 11.1-RELEASE, > will it crash the kernel? > > If the port nvidia-driver-304 is updated before 11.2 is released, > will `pkg upgrade` crash the kernel? Packages are built on the earliest supported release of a branch; never from the stable branch. These packages will be built from 11.1 until it goes EOL a couple months after 11.2 release. Breakage of packages from an earlier release of a branch is not ideal, so it would still be most helpful if someone could bissect this so that we can assess the breakage and figure out next steps before it becomes a bigger problem with the impending release. I've heard good things about the aforementioned devel/p5-App-SVN-Bisect for these purposes. Thanks, Kyle Evans