From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Jul 15 14: 1: 4 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A0802155FD; Thu, 15 Jul 1999 14:01:01 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com)
Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA02766;
	Thu, 15 Jul 1999 13:59:31 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com)
To: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com>
Cc: tg@ihf.rwth-aachen.de, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, kip@lyris.com,
	stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: seg fault in mutex_queue_enq 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 15 Jul 1999 13:08:45 EDT."
             <199907151708.NAA03267@pcnet1.pcnet.com> 
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 13:59:31 -0700
Message-ID: <2762.932072371@zippy.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> I don't care one way or the other.  I could leave out the wrapped
> poll() very easily and avoid the issue all together.  This would
> provide -stable with everything -current has, except of course
> poll().  I'd prefer to add poll, though...

I'm OK with adding poll(), it just seemed odd that the version number
bumped with no API interface changes taking place.  Handle it however
you best see fit. :)

- Jordan


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message