Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 13:59:31 -0700 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com> To: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> Cc: tg@ihf.rwth-aachen.de, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, kip@lyris.com, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: seg fault in mutex_queue_enq Message-ID: <2762.932072371@zippy.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 15 Jul 1999 13:08:45 EDT." <199907151708.NAA03267@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I don't care one way or the other. I could leave out the wrapped > poll() very easily and avoid the issue all together. This would > provide -stable with everything -current has, except of course > poll(). I'd prefer to add poll, though... I'm OK with adding poll(), it just seemed odd that the version number bumped with no API interface changes taking place. Handle it however you best see fit. :) - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2762.932072371>