From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Sep 25 7:12:26 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06F9E37B401 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 07:12:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from slate.dublin.wbtsystems.com (slate.dublin.wbtsystems.com [193.120.231.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2365443E6E for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 07:12:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from barry.byrne@wbtsystems.com) Received: from spiral (spiral.dublin.wbtsystems.com [193.120.231.113]) (authenticated bits=0) by slate.dublin.wbtsystems.com (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id g8PECJU2056751; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 15:12:19 +0100 (IST) From: "Barry Byrne" To: , "Lowell Gilbert" Cc: Subject: RE: 4.6.2 filesystem efficiency Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 15:12:18 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <200209250959.47310.trevarthan@wingnet.net> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-WBT-Authenticated-User: bb X-Scanned-By: slate/MIMEDefang 2.21 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Some performance/memory info at: http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=18975+0+archive/2001/freebsd-fs /20010624.freebsd-fs -- Barry Byrne, IT Manager, WBT Systems, Block 2, Harcourt Centre Harcourt Street, Dublin 2, Ireland > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Matthias > Trevarthan > Sent: 25 September 2002 15:00 > To: Barry Byrne; Lowell Gilbert > Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Re: 4.6.2 filesystem efficiency > > > Neat. Has anyone benchmarked this thing? Are there any reports > that detail the > performance increase? (And the RAM increase, I'm guessing) > > On Wednesday 25 September 2002 09:49, Barry Byrne wrote: > > Matthias: > > > > I think it was introduced in 4.4 but only enabled in the default kernel > > from 4.5 onwards. At least that's what my kernel confs seem to indicate. > > > > - Barry > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message