Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 7 May 2006 21:09:00 +0100 (BST)
From:      Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Cc:        performance@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org, csjp@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Fine-grained locking for POSIX local sockets (UNIX domain sockets)
Message-ID:  <20060507210824.F17611@fledge.watson.org>
In-Reply-To: <20060507195941.GA2978@xor.obsecurity.org>
References:  <20060506150622.C17611@fledge.watson.org> <200605071949.54978.hadara@bsd.ee> <20060507190844.K46997@fledge.watson.org> <200605072200.42529.hadara@bsd.ee> <20060507191641.GA1851@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060507205627.B46997@fledge.watson.org> <20060507195941.GA2978@xor.obsecurity.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Sun, 7 May 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:

>> Typically, I do 12 runs of supersmack in each configuration, and discard 
>> the first 2 runs in which the cache and scheduler (etc) are still settling, 
>> as I'm interested in the steady state.
>
> Yeah, forgot to mention that too.  Also keeping in mind that mysql 
> performance is not time-constant, e.g. you should restart it in between test 
> configurations instead of comparing early and late times.

Yeah, very much so -- my normal test procedure is to reboot between runs, 
allowing the first to cycles in the test to warm things up.

Robert N M Watson



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060507210824.F17611>