From owner-freebsd-perl@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 13 09:16:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-perl@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4CE116A4CF for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 09:16:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.ciam.ru (mail.ciam.ru [213.147.57.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32BC343D5D for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 09:16:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org) Received: from msd-mtu.mbrd.ru ([195.34.35.77] helo=[172.16.4.9]) by mail.ciam.ru with asmtp (Exim 4.x) id 1BvYA3-000CjR-Ab; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 13:15:48 +0400 Message-ID: <411C86BE.3020208@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 13:15:42 +0400 From: Sergey Matveychuk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.1) Gecko/20040707 X-Accept-Language: ru, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Alan, Cheng-Lung Sung" References: <56EFDC38-ED00-11D8-87C4-00039312D914@fillmore-labs.com> <411C7EC9.8040903@FreeBSD.org> <8c0cd4750408130158157ed9d8@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8c0cd4750408130158157ed9d8@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "proxy.ciam.ru", hasmessageblock similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details.may not impact too much (only eye's checking :-/) . > Since every pr only need to read an extra file (bsd.perl.mk), and their > behavior should retain...... [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description -------------------------------------------------- cc: freebsd-perl@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PERL_LEVEL conditional dependencies X-BeenThere: freebsd-perl@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: maintainer of a number of perl-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 09:16:11 -0000 Alan, Cheng-Lung Sung wrote: > Yes, I thought it may not impact too much (only eye's checking :-/) . > Since every pr only need to read an extra file (bsd.perl.mk), and their > behavior should retain...... The patch I've sent contains fixes for 38 ports. A script I've wrote detects 149 ports more with the same problems. Oliver, is it real to run pointyhat if I'll fix them? -- Sem.