Date: Sat, 18 Jan 1997 22:32:40 +0000 From: Brian Somers <brian@awfulhak.demon.co.uk> To: Akihiro Tominaga <tomy@gunpowder.Stanford.EDU> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (wide) DHCP negotiation using the REQUEST_IPADDR option Message-ID: <199701182232.WAA06586@awfulhak.demon.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 17 Jan 1997 23:10:05 PST." <199701182013.MAA27661@gunpowder.Stanford.EDU>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[.....]
> No. Please consider about the following case.
>
> A client is assigned 10.0.0.1 from server 'A'.
> The server 'A' goes down with some trouble.
> The client can't extend lease for 10.0.0.1 then gives up to use it.
> The client is assigned 10.0.0.2 from server 'B'.
> The lease for 10.0.0.1 expires.
> The server 'A' comes up again. It has expired lease of 10.0.0.1
> The client can't extend the lease for 10.0.0.2, because of some trouble.
>
> Now, the client goes to init-reboot state, and send DHCPREQUEST with
> requested-IP address "10.0.0.2".
>
> Although server 'B' sends back ACK, but server 'A' sends back NAK
> previously, the client cannot use "10.0.0.2".
>
> Do you understand?
[.....]
Yep - I conceed. It must then be the case that when the lease expires,
the client will ask for the same IP again, but if it doesn't receive an
ACK, must *not* use that IP anyway (but should then send a request without
a suggested IP).
Assuming the above is correct, once an IP is given for a certain amount of
time, it *can't* be changed before that time expires without intervention
on both sides. I was (incorrectly) expecting to be able to "change my
mind" from the server end.
I'll roll the FreeBSD patch back out - sorry if I've caused any grief.
Thanks.
--
Brian <brian@awfulhak.demon.co.uk>, <brian@freebsd.org>
<http://www.awfulhak.demon.co.uk/>;
Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour....
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199701182232.WAA06586>