Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 13:44:01 -0400 From: Frank Laszlo <laszlof@vonostingroup.com> To: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tomcat55 port on AMD64 Message-ID: <446377E1.4030505@vonostingroup.com> In-Reply-To: <24921858@srv.sem.ipt.ru> References: <00bd01c6750a$b7c631e0$0a1610ac@prodcave.com> <4463603F.3050600@vonostingroup.com> <39169750@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <44636F83.8020103@vonostingroup.com> <73088465@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <44637568.4020203@vonostingroup.com> <24921858@srv.sem.ipt.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Thu, 11 May 2006 13:33:28 -0400 Frank Laszlo wrote: > >> Boris Samorodov wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 11 May 2006 13:08:19 -0400 Frank Laszlo wrote: >>> >>>> Boris Samorodov wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Thu, 11 May 2006 12:03:11 -0400 Frank Laszlo wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> I submitted a patch[1] to fix this issue some time ago, It has to do >>>>>> with the way linux ports handle ARCH, since the linux emulation port >>>>>> doesn't work on amd64, its forced to use i386 rpm's. Unfortunately my >>>>>> efforts were shun by a brick wall, and no changes were made to address >>>>>> this. I am going to repeat this one more time, ARCH should NEVER be >>>>>> overwritten, here is yet another example of why. >>>>>> [1]http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/91911 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Seems that this problem shouldn't exist since updating of the port to >>>>> use new bsd.linux-rpm.mk. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> You would think so, but the fact of the matter is, ARCH should be a >>>> READONLY variable. It is relied upon heavily in the ports framework and >>>> shouldn't be changed, ever. Why we don't just use another variable name >>>> to do the trickery is what I am wondering. >>>> >>> Argh, yes. You are right. It do have problems with current default >>> port linux_base-8. I'm using linux_base-fc3 for a long time and get >>> used to it too much. >>> > > >> It looks like linux_base-fc3 is basically doing what my patch was >> intended for, renaming the poor use of ARCH to something else >> (LINUX_RPM_ARCH) so that we are not overwriting such an important >> variable. But it does still have this for some reason: >> > > >> .if (${ARCH} == "amd64") >> LATEST_LINK:= ${LATEST_LINK:C/linux/linux32/} >> ARCH= i386 >> .endif >> > > >> I'm not really sure what purpose that serves, as ARCH isn't used >> anywhere in the Makefile. perhaps I am missing something from >> bsd.linux-rpm.mk. >> > > I think that it is intended to use with the packages. As we discussed > earlier, there is now native linux on AMD. Hence, one should fetch and > install those for i386. > > > WBR > You mean "there is *not* native linux on AMD." correct? __________________________________________________ Frank Laszlo System Administrator The VonOstin Group Email: laszlof@tvog.net WWW: http://www.vonostingroup.com Mobile: 248-863-7584
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?446377E1.4030505>