From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 12 15:51:57 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BF46D26 for ; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:51:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 096158FC0C for ; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:51:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-bk0-f54.google.com with SMTP id jm19so1532786bkc.13 for ; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 07:51:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=e9XmUCr+WFsxAM6Ogrgy6eE/1/OUto3QiVH7JOfglkU=; b=0aBNfMw08e2lWD/LKyNXb2q+vSEjMs154hCXBNi2kcgJcTxniuWkG36a2Nhj31GQdl 4CA2KZUxS2Ll47fELL2SJZJKBW6drHk3iHwU70+TdRhhRjVYJ+ZJRgxHqJnYzqeCMW5I sfxrmrqqVFFAmL2oZHEwpG24L6sB3k7aecPnQ7ktozvVB8wLKl1Bjiv/J+r6T5kX3gm0 M6XTCVjsPHgsom1IVvOaZb1Gzm4IAZ3ktak+k9b+FWJa+wi4qq0vgiKfnlf1TqPOFe5x DDTJnTi6z+f5huD2Fs0FlJn9PVDW44SKbLB0lBUWHdzktf/NTU6cMpuT9tlsKZVawnQg UExw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.7.213 with SMTP id e21mr7127310bke.32.1352735515945; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 07:51:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.50.197 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 07:51:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.50.197 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 07:51:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20121112051229.GA1235@mycenae.sbb.rs> Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:51:55 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: nomenclature for conf files From: Chris Rees To: Kurt Buff Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: FreeBSD , Zoran Kolic X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:51:57 -0000 On 12 Nov 2012 15:35, "Kurt Buff" wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 12:29 AM, Chris Rees wrote: > > > > On 12 Nov 2012 05:20, "Kurt Buff" wrote: > >> > >> On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Zoran Kolic wrote: > >> > It might sound stupid, but I'd like to know if there's > >> > any difference. Are those 3 line the same? > >> > > >> > WITH_KMS=YES > >> > WITH_KMS="YES" > >> > WITH_KMS=yes > >> > >> With regard to their use in /etc/rc.conf, no, absolutely not. > >> > >> In general, from my experience, only the second one will work. > >> > >> This might, or might not, be true for other uses, but rc.conf is > >> pretty picky about this. > > > > All three are fine in make.conf and rc.conf > > > > The issue with rc.conf is when people put spaces around the = sign. > > > > Chris > > This has not been my experience - but I will experiment soon and see > if I can verify. Anything that complains about any of those syntaxes is a bug. Please file a PR if you find any examples. Chris