From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Mar 28 07:14:37 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id HAA13857 for questions-outgoing; Fri, 28 Mar 1997 07:14:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from Campino.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE (campino.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE [137.226.116.240]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA13848 for ; Fri, 28 Mar 1997 07:14:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de (gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de [137.226.31.2]) by Campino.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE (RBI-Z-5/8.6.12) with ESMTP id QAA02786; Fri, 28 Mar 1997 16:14:32 +0100 (MET) Received: (from kuku@localhost) by gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de (8.8.5/8.6.9) id QAA27656; Fri, 28 Mar 1997 16:26:35 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 28 Mar 1997 16:26:35 +0100 From: kuku@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de (Christoph Kukulies) To: hgoldste@bbs.mpcs.com Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 2.2.1-RELEASE and xdm References: <199703271551.KAA07149@bbs.mpcs.com> X-Mailer: Mutt 0.58e Mime-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <199703271551.KAA07149@bbs.mpcs.com>; from Howard Goldstein on Mar 27, 1997 10:51:44 -0500 Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Howard Goldstein writes: > In article , doug > white wrote: > : > : Uh, hm. Unfortunately, X is a big mess for now, I wouldn't have > : recommended playing with it if your exsiting copy was v3.2 and working > : properly. It's compiled for 3.0-CURRENT and will cause odd problems for > : you if you aren't running it... What actually are the problems with X (F8632) in the 2.2.1R tree ? (besides that it is a link to 3.2/binaries/FreeBSD-current) I assume it is compiled after the wtmp/utmp changes and WRT that 2.2.1R is in sync. So where then is the mess? > > What advice do you have for someone running X 3.1.2? Should I wait > on taking the plunge into 2.2.1R until X is fixed? > -- --Chris Christoph P. U. Kukulies kuku@gil.physik.rwth-aachen.de