From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 02:50:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D3498F1 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 02:50:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13E1ADB7 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 02:50:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r0F2o0uR065546 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 02:50:00 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r0F2o0EY065545; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 02:50:00 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 02:50:00 GMT Message-Id: <201301150250.r0F2o0EY065545@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Alexander Motin Subject: Re: bin/166589: atacontrol(8) incorrectly treats RAID10 and 0+1 the same X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Alexander Motin List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 02:50:01 -0000 The following reply was made to PR bin/166589; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Alexander Motin To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, landsidel.allen@gmail.com Cc: Subject: Re: bin/166589: atacontrol(8) incorrectly treats RAID10 and 0+1 the same Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 04:46:02 +0200 There could be variants in terminology, but in fact for most of users they are the same. If you have opinion why they should be treated differently, please explain it. -- Alexander Motin