From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Jul 21 13: 8: 5 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from bsdie.rwsystems.net (bsdie.rwsystems.net [209.197.223.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEB0D37BEA6 for ; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 13:07:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jwyatt@rwsystems.net) Received: from bsdie.rwsystems.net([209.197.223.2]) (1255 bytes) by bsdie.rwsystems.net via sendmail with P:esmtp/R:bind_hosts/T:inet_zone_bind_smtp (sender: ) id for ; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 15:00:31 -0500 (CDT) (Smail-3.2.0.106 1999-Mar-31 #1 built 1999-Aug-7) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 15:00:29 -0500 (CDT) From: James Wyatt To: Alan Batie Cc: isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DHCP & DNS In-Reply-To: <20000721101353.40449@batie.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-ID: Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I thought this was what DDNS was all about. Otherwise you just have static addresses on DHCP... Under DDNS I thought there were hooks to allow updates from the DHCP server. Obviously I haven't tried this yet either, but we looked into it a while back when we thought we would have the requirement. Am I missing something? - Jy@ On Fri, 21 Jul 2000, Alan Batie wrote: > What do people use to tie DHCP into DNS? From a cursory look, it doesn't > look like the Unix versions do this, and of all places, I would have expected > them to. The NT version doesn't either, expecting WINS to pick up the slack. > So, it looks to me like something has to be crafted up by hand? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message