Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 16:50:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Ian Dowse <iedowse@FreeBSD.org> To: kwhite@uottawa.ca, iedowse@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/20042: "rsh -t" doesn't timeout if rcmd(3) never returns [patch included] Message-ID: <200208092350.g79No5oZ096260@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Synopsis: "rsh -t" doesn't timeout if rcmd(3) never returns [patch included] State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: iedowse State-Changed-When: Fri Aug 9 16:44:37 PDT 2002 State-Changed-Why: It isn't safe to call errx() from a signal handler - would you like to suggest a better patch that uses only functions that are documented in sigaction(2) as being safe to call? You can also remove the #ifdef's from around the new code. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=20042 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200208092350.g79No5oZ096260>