From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 19 20:02:28 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0E3DD5D; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 20:02:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qc0-x236.google.com (mail-qc0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B82A13A5; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 20:02:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id e16so1415582qcx.13 for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 12:02:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=qJMm4nownejKCUhRZ8EPTQ5pfhPt6bh+h2BiexpNTxg=; b=FyQtD0V4vV194zQN54pcVE4MmXMWSjyLfyy3z+zSqZK82uMjFcVcLGJnkMTDvN/VGY wzUtorzIK8mS0A1SulrQ0W5Nd/i8FUPkiLeda0v57s803blfh1lDhvfINcuv6Hr9dLn+ 00maD2lI+ntzm73Ser5X7evvZ5m3BTyN5b1T+TO/d1cIqmQ4CkK2EeWonHwN6lH4RTTJ QrdgAnRC6MJonByUEEkim4GSIaDeike1EJhxrZSDf2UsPMQAYNkDyEsb87OEFf4TWgNp 59gYyZSyRjvBdxugm+fDAh4afHSZgxKCO5oAJTzzWqASL+DCtoaIInkVC8C+06N2ogia 3ZJQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.229.24.4 with SMTP id t4mr6601693qcb.13.1387483347405; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 12:02:27 -0800 (PST) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.224.53.200 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 12:02:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1387204500.12061.60192349.19EAE1B4@webmail.messagingengine.com> Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 12:02:27 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: iITaZI1yTLhSSSA2RjkuQshU2ig Message-ID: Subject: Re: 10.0-RC1: bad mbuf leak? From: Adrian Chadd To: Michael Tuexen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: FreeBSD Net , FreeBSD Stable Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 20:02:28 -0000 On 19 December 2013 01:09, Michael Tuexen wrote: > On Dec 19, 2013, at 9:41 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > >> Hm, try reverting just the em code to that from a 10.0-BETA? Just in >> case something changed there? > I saw a similar behaviour without the patches we are discussing (regarding > ignoring the error). Hm. Why was that? -a