Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 16:59:36 +0000 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: clang support for compiler:openmp Message-ID: <20161107165936.GB34216@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> In-Reply-To: <20161106073622.GA17279@athena.sysfault.org> References: <20161106073622.GA17279@athena.sysfault.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--7ZAtKRhVyVSsbBD2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 08:36:22AM +0100, Marcus von Appen wrote: > Hi, >=20 > is there a specific reason, why we do not (yet) have openmp support for > clang via compiler:openmp? With devel/openmp in the ports tree, I'd > expect compiler:openmp to set >=20 > LIB_DEPENDS+=3D libomp.so:devel/openmp >=20 > for compiler=3Dclang. CFLAGS and LIBS/LDFLAGS might be tweaked on a > per-port level. I talked with Baptiste about this in Belgrade. I think the best way forward would be to remove the OPENMP option from the llvm ports and alter the clang-patch-fopenmp.diff patch to use the .so from devel/openmp. I have a major deadline at the end of the week so it definitely won't happen this week. -- Brooks --7ZAtKRhVyVSsbBD2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJYILL4AAoJEKzQXbSebgfAAo0H/RB09pTEnD7amNTB4dYFaNIY X6Uab2uJtC2P3UhOX6s3cQCLah99PprPN6OQ0GCsX67kGlZuz/9f09H8SHt8fi9N iecWGPjTEGkHZipBwZ4cAkt6UqEsdyWq6CGKxuAg+zJzCcb3XG3nurcUI65HoUk3 Wi+H3csHjqdtAO6Dd8uqj9jkSu3jxc++1lS2sQN5m9wRZIuoxyssm4pOtYzJwYVq hbQPOOZTN9jtr4yXQTBabgQfhRG99p+xWXvMOLPkxLZWz3yPuMmR3nKMCbs+B5zN hdaHWRGoN05t7mDf/5MOhATN2JClb0UfML8uCcxPg6uKYj2l86mwOXorG11zt8c= =eqNa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7ZAtKRhVyVSsbBD2--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20161107165936.GB34216>