Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 07 Jan 2016 21:33:33 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        java@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 204989] java/openjdk8: jps in openjdk8 or javavmwrapper conflicts with sysutils/jps in /usr/local/bin/jps
Message-ID:  <bug-204989-8522-jrbuz2Ofzp@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-204989-8522@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-204989-8522@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D204989

--- Comment #3 from Dave Cottlehuber <dch@skunkwerks.at> ---
Hi Pavel, as a new comer to FreeBSD my POLA was that:

1. all files,links,resources installed by a package should be registered in=
 pkg
db
2. conflicting pkg/ports should be marked as such (or resolved!)
3. pkg itself should warn or possibly fail to install conflicts unless --fo=
rce
or similar flag is given

I see 2 things to do here:

1. decide what, if anything to do about POLA#1 for openjdk8, assuming pkg c=
an
track softlinks.

2. decide what to do about POLA#2 and POLA#3 for pkg. I can raise another
ticket if required but I'd like to see one of the pkg people at least comme=
nt
on this thread first.

Sounds sensible to you?

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-204989-8522-jrbuz2Ofzp>