From owner-cvs-all Wed Feb 28 22:15:43 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C52B37B71A; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 22:15:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bde@zeta.org.au) Received: from bde.zeta.org.au (bde.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.102]) by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA18054; Thu, 1 Mar 2001 17:15:32 +1100 Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 17:15:28 +1100 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-Sender: bde@besplex.bde.org To: "David O'Brien" Cc: Nate Williams , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ar Makefile src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/as Makefile.inc0 src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld Makefile src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ranlib Makefile In-Reply-To: <20010228103817.C20637@dragon.nuxi.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, David O'Brien wrote: > On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 11:12:00AM -0700, Nate Williams wrote: > > > Given a static toolchain, you can build a static make(1) easily enough. > > > > How, w/out a working make? Are you expecting the user to build it by > > hand? > > I fail to see what is hard about ``cc -DDEFSHELL=1 -I. *.c */*.c''. > If one cannot do that, I really do not think they have the ability to > recover from other brokenness. That's too hard :-). You should be able to read the instructions out of Makefile.dist. However, Makefile.dist doesn't know about the DEFSHELL wart. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message