From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 12 14:38:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C5A01065674; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 14:38:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from remko@elvandar.org) Received: from mailgate.jr-hosting.nl (mailgate.jr-hosting.nl [IPv6:2a01:4f8:63:1281::3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B47618FC13; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 14:38:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from websrv01.jr-hosting.nl (mailrelay.jr-hosting.nl [IPv6:2a01:4f8:63:1281::4]) by mailgate.jr-hosting.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 153401CC4D; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 16:38:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from a83-163-38-147.adsl.xs4all.nl ([83.163.38.147] helo=[10.0.2.10]) by websrv01.jr-hosting.nl with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Ounh9-000Axc-VR; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 16:38:16 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Remko Lodder In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 16:38:15 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <3D8EDB79-9DA6-4690-894F-6E6526C5B207@elvandar.org> References: <201009082014.o88KER1S029689@repoman.freebsd.org> <20100909184128.GA1647@gothic.blackend.org> <4DF8F4AE-1D49-49DF-9098-01C9C73804C7@elvandar.org> To: Gabor PALI X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) Cc: doc-committers@freebsd.org, doc@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, cvs-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/fr_FR.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/multimedia chapter.sgml doc/fr_FR.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/mirrors chapter.sgml X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 14:38:17 -0000 On Sep 12, 2010, at 4:34 PM, Gabor PALI wrote: > On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Remko Lodder = wrote: > Yes, it does make sense to keep them in CVS, because it takes a hell = lot more time to get them translated again then to update the various = pieces. >=20 > I think I know this very well. >=20 >=20 > Note that I the things that you are suggestion are striking me as one = of the translation teams. We (doc-nl) will decide for ourself whether or = not we update documentation and whether or not we will be keeping = 'stale' documents around. >=20 > Obviously. I am just curious, because I do not see too much sense to = keep outdated translations in the tree. >=20 Having translations in the first place makes people trigger, when I = started the doc-nl project, there were translations in progress all the = time and people got onboard because someone showed an example. Currently Rene is keeping up the translations because I have = severe time problems :) (like anyone); so the stick went on. If at some = point Rene cannot keep up and I have issues too, then the translations remain { Up to some point ofcourse } so that = a new potential one can keep it up. If we were to remove those things, = it would become impossible to keep it up, someone has to start the translations from the ground up, which is an effort = that not many people can and want to take { been there done it, got the = translations ready! } :) Cheers :r >=20 > :g >=20 --=20 /"\ Best regards, | remko@FreeBSD.org \ / Remko Lodder | remko@EFnet X http://www.evilcoder.org/ | / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News