From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 10:37:42 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52E4F16A4BF for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2003 10:37:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ebb.errno.com (ebb.errno.com [66.127.85.87]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9601643F75 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2003 10:37:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sam@errno.com) Received: from melange.errno.com (melange.errno.com [66.127.85.82]) (authenticated bits=0) by ebb.errno.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h82Hbb17046759 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 2 Sep 2003 10:37:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sam@errno.com) Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2003 10:37:36 -0700 From: Sam Leffler To: Poul-Henning Kamp , current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <752234866.1062499054@melange.errno.com> In-Reply-To: <44516.1062495892@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <44516.1062495892@critter.freebsd.dk> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.0.3 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: TESTERS: if_sis patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2003 17:37:42 -0000 > Please try out this patch if you have a "sis" based network card. > > It sets a 400usec interrupt holdoff, and this seems to have a profound > impact on network performance. > > The patch is relative to FreeBSD-current but probably applies on > 5.0, 5.1 and even 4.x as well. > > In my tests, using a soekris 4801 computer I have found: > > fetch(1)'ing a ftp:// file from a server on the local segment > is 43.2% +/-0.7% faster (from around 385 to 640 kBps). > > FTP of the same file is 10.6% +/-1.2% faster (from 3.11 to > 3.44 MB/sec) > > Checking out src/sbin from a NFS mounted CVSROOT was 17.0% > +/-1.0% faster. It is especially important that folks with Soekris 45xx boards try this. My tests appeared to indicate there might be issues, but my operating environment is so different from -current that is was hard to tell if the problems I saw (lost packets) were due to this change or others. Sam