From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Aug 24 19:28:30 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id TAA17638
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 24 Aug 1995 19:28:30 -0700
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226])
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id TAA17632
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 24 Aug 1995 19:28:26 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id TAA20549; Thu, 24 Aug 1995 19:26:44 -0700
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com>
cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@freefall.FreeBSD.org>,
        jgreco@brasil.moneng.mei.com (Joe Greco), terryl@CS.Stanford.EDU,
        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ISDN Anyone? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 24 Aug 1995 06:35:32 PDT."
             <23334.809271332@critter.tfs.com> 
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 1995 19:26:44 -0700
Message-ID: <20546.809317604@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> There is actually a lot more promise in a 16550 or 16650 at 460800 bps.
> You only get 1/16th or 1/32th the number of interrupts.

Hmmm.  I find that the serial interrupt overhead is pretty intense at 115.2
even with a 16550.  You know some secret for doing this I don't?

				Jordan