From owner-freebsd-bugs Sun Aug 24 01:30:03 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id BAA22293 for bugs-outgoing; Sun, 24 Aug 1997 01:30:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id BAA22287; Sun, 24 Aug 1997 01:30:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 1997 01:30:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199708240830.BAA22287@hub.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs Cc: From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) Subject: Re: bin/2489 Reply-To: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk The following reply was made to PR bin/2489; it has been noted by GNATS. From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) To: ac199@hwcn.org, sprice@hiwaay.net (Steve Price), paul@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bin/2489 Date: Sun, 24 Aug 1997 10:12:21 +0200 As ac199@hwcn.org wrote: > Bill Fenner, in a message dated Sun, 19 Jan 1997 20:40:53 PST, on the > FreeBSD-bugs list, with the subject "Re: bin/2528: fetch(1)'s timeout is > ridiculously short", blamed this on the ">>" string being at the start of > some lines. Probably. I've tried to reproduce it locally, but it seems this doesn't happen inside send-pr. So it's likely a GNATS server issue. Unless Steve or Paul are going to look after this, i'd suggest to set the state of this PR to `suspended', since we are unlikely to ever fix it inside the FreeBSD group. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)