From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Dec  5 17:30:16 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B77D14F6F
	for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun,  5 Dec 1999 17:30:11 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from bright@wintelcom.net)
Received: from localhost (bright@localhost)
	by fw.wintelcom.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA15947;
	Sun, 5 Dec 1999 17:59:21 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 1999 17:59:21 -0800 (PST)
From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: vfs_bio questions/nfs cluster commit
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.9912041342290.4557-100000@fw.wintelcom.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.9912051755090.4557-100000@fw.wintelcom.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


oh, one more thing... (replying to myself)

On Sun, 5 Dec 1999, Alfred Perlstein wrote:

> 
> I've been trying to workout mega-clusters for NFS, since afaik the
> vfs_cluster code will only do 64k chunks and we can benifit greatly
> by compacting ranges for commit RPCs.

My code seems to have the strange side-effect that it also fixes normal
commit clustering for NFS which afaik is broken.

can anyone confirm this?

-Alfred



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message