From owner-cvs-all Fri Jan 12 8:54:17 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5414037B69F; Fri, 12 Jan 2001 08:53:45 -0800 (PST) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA58236; Fri, 12 Jan 2001 11:53:44 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 11:53:44 -0500 (EST) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <200101121653.LAA58236@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Doug Barton Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Randomness and vi In-Reply-To: <3A5ED3F7.D7993677@FreeBSD.org> References: <200101120644.f0C6hvI12630@gratis.grondar.za> <200101120534.f0C5YYH96390@earth.backplane.com> <200101120652.f0C6qls78578@harmony.village.org> <200101120711.f0C7B4Y97991@earth.backplane.com> <3A5EC46D.A912BC6F@FreeBSD.org> <3A5ED3F7.D7993677@FreeBSD.org> Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG < said: > found out the hard way that vi needs randomness to run when I was doing vi doesn't need randomness to run. However, some overzealous coder may have changed it to waste good randomness when all it needs to do is feed its PRNG. I have seen several instances of this (not naming names) but did not think to protest. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message